Talk:SpaceElevatorApplications: Difference between revisions
From SpaceElevatorWiki.com
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: The climber has the most engineering work that needs to be done and the most opportunity for individuals and groups to get directly involved. Work needed on the Applications: {| border...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|Evaluate long-term economic impact of a space elevator for investor/owner || How rich do owners become in various scenarios, how would an elevator affect the builder's economy (U.S., Japan, Germany, Korea, Luxembourg, Saudi Arabia, ...) | |Evaluate long-term economic impact of a space elevator for investor/owner || How rich do owners become in various scenarios, how would an elevator affect the builder's economy (U.S., Japan, Germany, Korea, Luxembourg, Saudi Arabia, ...) | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 10:09, 3 July 2008
The climber has the most engineering work that needs to be done and the most opportunity for individuals and groups to get directly involved.
Work needed on the Applications:
| Item | Notes |
| Full review and independent assessment of lunar base proposal | Viability, issues, business or other rational for doing this. |
| Full review of Solar Power Satellite concept | Realistically do we need SSP? If so review and evaluate Kellum's work. Categorize potential sponsors for such a system - Japan, British Petroleum,..., also is manned presence required if so evaluate geostation viability |
| Evaluate tourism potential | Based on current space tourism studies, what is the best business case for tourism with the space elevator - 8 hour trips to LEO, 24 hour trips to LEO, 3 week trips to a GEO station,...? |
| Evaluate long-term economic impact of a space elevator for investor/owner | How rich do owners become in various scenarios, how would an elevator affect the builder's economy (U.S., Japan, Germany, Korea, Luxembourg, Saudi Arabia, ...) |
