SpaceElevatorApplications: Difference between revisions
From SpaceElevatorWiki.com
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Unprotected "SpaceElevatorApplications": Let everyone work on this page.) |
(Add SSP proposal) |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|width="600pt"| Status | |width="600pt"| Status | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Solar Power Satellites || Air Force write up, NASA report, JAXA Report, ESA Report, NAS Report, Kellum report | |Solar Power Satellites || Air Force write up, NASA report, JAXA Report, ESA Report, NAS Report, Kellum report [[Image:SSP-SE_Proposal.odt]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Lunar Base || [[Image:SE_Lunar_Program_1.odt]], [[Image:SE_Lunar.odt]] | |Lunar Base || [[Image:SE_Lunar_Program_1.odt]], [[Image:SE_Lunar.odt]] |
Latest revision as of 06:15, 16 January 2009
Title: Applications | ||
About:
|
Tags:
|
Applications
Justification for construction of the space elevator is critical - to reason to build it and it won't be built. To this end, well defined applications are absolutely critical.
Application | Status |
Solar Power Satellites | Air Force write up, NASA report, JAXA Report, ESA Report, NAS Report, Kellum report File:SSP-SE Proposal.odt |
Lunar Base | File:SE Lunar Program 1.odt, File:SE Lunar.odt |
Mars Elevator / Base | File:Martian Elevator.odt, File:Mars cable.dxf, |
Asteroid Elevator | File:Asteroid Elevator.odt |
Geostation | Write-up of concept File:Inflatable Geodesic Sphere.odt, 3d model File:GeoStation.wrl, |
Tourism | File:ASCENTFinalReport V1.pdf, File:ASCENTFinalReport V2.pdf Futron reports |
Military | File:SE military White Paper.odt |
Spin-off technology | SpinOffTechnology |
Status
The climber has the most engineering work that needs to be done and the most opportunity for individuals and groups to get directly involved.
Work Needed
Item | Notes | Completed and Ongoing Efforts |
Full review and independent assessment of lunar base proposal | Viability, issues, business or other rational for doing this. |
|
Full review of Solar Power Satellite concept | Realistically do we need SSP? If so review and evaluate Kellum's work. Categorize potential sponsors for such a system - Japan, British Petroleum,..., also is manned presence required if so evaluate geostation viability | |
Evaluate tourism potential | Based on current space tourism studies, what is the best business case for tourism with the space elevator - 8 hour trips to LEO, 24 hour trips to LEO, 3 week trips to a GEO station,...? | |
Evaluate long-term economic impact of a space elevator for investor/owner | How rich do owners become in various scenarios, how would an elevator affect the builder's economy (U.S., Japan, Germany, Korea, Luxembourg, Saudi Arabia, ...) |