Dibbs: Difference between revisions

From SpaceElevatorWiki.com
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 170: Line 170:
<issues project = "Abraham Becker" search="false" filter="false" />
<issues project = "Abraham Becker" search="false" filter="false" />


     I propose the investigation of a failsafe emergency system for space elevator that would protect crew, climbers and potentially the SE ribbon itself in the event of a severing of the ribbon at LEO.  This would be achieved through the use of a ribbon deployable reflector mechanism and collections of ground based lasers to support the hardware in the event of a catastrophic sever.  Given the relatively narrow range (300 - 4000km) of a likely ribbon sever, a limited number of deployable reflectors could effect a SE ribbon failsafe system.
     I propose the investigation of a failsafe emergency system for space  
     The reflectors could either make use of (1)laser ablative material or (2)laser photonic pressure to achieve the lift to ensure the safety of crew and assets.  The key issue would be the development of a long lasting laser ablative with sufficient thrust capability to achieve the objective.  Alternately, the photon pressure could be employed when the price-performance of megawatt lasers drops below a tipping point to enable the economic feasibility of such an undertaking.
elevator that would protect crew, climbers and potentially the SE ribbon itself
     Optimally, the lower ribbon could be suspended for a long enough duration to be re-attached with the upper ribbon portion and normal operations to resume.  The upper portion of the ribbon could be held in place by a similar system only inverted to deploy the beams down from GEO to a reflector above the sever point.  The propulsion beams could be controled to create an intercept and eventual fusion of the ribbon segments.
in the event of a severing of the ribbon at LEO.  This would be achieved  
     This investigation would be advisable in light of the extreme cost of SE assets and the integral need for safety and sustainability.  Even if normal operation of SE poses little threat of ribbon sever, unexpected events such as a coronal mass ejection intercept with the earth's magnetosphere could make a sever much more likely due to attendant variations of trajectories of LEO objects.  The additional costs of such a system would be more lasers of the kind to be developed in any event for the power beaming app.   
through the use of a ribbon deployable reflector mechanism and collections of
ground based lasers to support the hardware in the event of a catastrophic  
sever.  Given the relatively narrow range (300 - 4000km) of a likely ribbon  
sever, a limited number of deployable reflectors could effect a SE ribbon  
failsafe system.
 
     The reflectors could either make use of (1)laser ablative material or (2)
laser photonic pressure to achieve the lift to ensure the safety of crew and  
assets.  The key issue would be the development of a long lasting laser  
ablative with sufficient thrust capability to achieve the objective.   
Alternately, the photon pressure could be employed when the price-performance  
of megawatt lasers drops below a tipping point to enable the economic  
feasibility of such an undertaking.
 
     Optimally, the lower ribbon could be suspended for a long enough duration  
to be re-attached with the upper ribbon portion and normal operations to  
resume.  The upper portion of the ribbon could be held in place by a similar  
system only inverted to deploy the beams down from GEO to a reflector above the  
sever point.  The propulsion beams could be controled to create an intercept  
and eventual fusion of the ribbon segments.
 
     This investigation would be advisable in light of the extreme cost of SE  
assets and the integral need for safety and sustainability.  Even if normal  
operation of SE poses little threat of ribbon sever, unexpected events such as  
a coronal mass ejection intercept with the earth's magnetosphere could make a  
sever much more likely due to attendant variations of trajectories of LEO  
objects.  The additional costs of such a system would be more lasers of the  
kind to be developed in any event for the power beaming app.   
 
                       ANB 07/25/08
                       ANB 07/25/08


Revision as of 05:53, 25 July 2008

Title: Dibbs

[Cover Img]

About:

  • Moderator: Ben Shelef
  • Created: July 6, 2008
  • Modified: July 6, 2008

Tags:

  • This is a collaborative article
  • Discipline(s): Wiki, Engineering
 

Abstract

This is a collaborative page used for figuring out who's doing what.

Editors: it's easiest to use the section-edit links to get straight to the list you want to modify

Because of a bug in the issue tracker: it is best to add or edit issues on your user page, and only SHOW your issues on this page.

Brad Edwards

brad_edwards@yahoo.com

<issues project = "Edwards" filter = "false" search = "false" />

Kinda Done In Progress Intend to do
  • General Wiki set-up
  • Filling in background material for people to work with
  • Fleshing out work projects
  • Recruit people
  • Collaboration in general
  • Filling in the integration Matrix - this may be constantly changing and too complex to be useful so I need to evaluate it first
  • Will pick my favorite technical topics to work once the site is up and operational

Ben Shelef

Kinda Done In Progress Intend to do

Andrew Price

email: aprice2704@gmail.com

http://www.healthspace.com HealthSpace Integrated Solutions Ltd.

http://www.skyder.com Skyder Research Ltd.

Wants a space elevator that can lift 400,000 teu (20ft containers) of cargo per year

<issues project = "Aprice" filter = "false" search = "false" />

Kinda Done In Progress Intend to do
  • Perhaps -- Coordinator of the Journal of Space Elevator Science, a publication of the Space Elevator Systems Institute

Ed Gray

Economics ed_gray@sbcglobal.net

<issues project = "Ed Gray" search="false" filter="false" />

Kinda Done In Progress Intend to do

Greg Rebholz

Legal Pillar (wiki) gregrebholz@gmail.com <issues project = "Greg Rebholz" search="false" filter="false" />

Kinda Done In Progress Intend to do
  • Distribute legal landscape paper
  • Formation of communications group
  • Development of Legal Pillar on wiki
  • Network with space law lawyers to seed the SE concept
  • Agency creation

Amie Ellison

Japanese Translation <issues project = "Amie Ellison" search="false" filter="false" />

Abraham Becker

Ablative Propulsion for Contingency Reentry <issues project = "Abraham Becker" search="false" filter="false" /> 

   I propose the investigation of a failsafe emergency system for space

elevator that would protect crew, climbers and potentially the SE ribbon itself in the event of a severing of the ribbon at LEO. This would be achieved through the use of a ribbon deployable reflector mechanism and collections of 

ground based lasers to support the hardware in the event of a catastrophic

sever. Given the relatively narrow range (300 - 4000km) of a likely ribbon sever, a limited number of deployable reflectors could effect a SE ribbon failsafe system. 

    The reflectors could either make use of (1)laser ablative material or (2)

laser photonic pressure to achieve the lift to ensure the safety of crew and assets. The key issue would be the development of a long lasting laser ablative with sufficient thrust capability to achieve the objective. Alternately, the photon pressure could be employed when the price-performance of megawatt lasers drops below a tipping point to enable the economic feasibility of such an undertaking. 

    Optimally, the lower ribbon could be suspended for a long enough duration

to be re-attached with the upper ribbon portion and normal operations to resume. The upper portion of the ribbon could be held in place by a similar system only inverted to deploy the beams down from GEO to a reflector above the sever point. The propulsion beams could be controled to create an intercept and eventual fusion of the ribbon segments. 

    This investigation would be advisable in light of the extreme cost of SE

assets and the integral need for safety and sustainability. Even if normal operation of SE poses little threat of ribbon sever, unexpected events such as a coronal mass ejection intercept with the earth's magnetosphere could make a sever much more likely due to attendant variations of trajectories of LEO objects. The additional costs of such a system would be more lasers of the kind to be developed in any event for the power beaming app. 

                      ANB 07/25/08

Andreas Hein

Ablative Propulsion for Contingency Reentry <issues project = "Andreas Hein" search="false" filter="false" />

Bryan Laubscher

Red Team Concept - Oscillations, Satellites and Debris <issues project = "Bryan Laubscher" search="false" filter="false" />

Jim Dempsey

Numerical simulation tools <issues project = "Jim Dempsey" search="false" filter="false" />

David Lang

<issues project = "David Lang" search="false" filter="false" />

Ted Semon

<issues project = "Ted Semon" search="false" filter="false" />

Blaise Gassend

<issues project = "Blaise Gassend" search="false" filter="false" />

Keith Curtis

Software & Simulation work

<issues project = "Simulation" search="false" filter="false" />

Wiki work

<issues project = "WikiTodo" search="false" filter="false" />

Christopher J Petrella

Spinoff Technologies

Retrieved from "http://spaceelevatorwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Dibbs&oldid=1663"